It is subjective in nature, such a meaning may have developed due to being a part of a certain culture or a particular group. It is a sociological theory, also known as a symbolic interaction perspective. eval(ez_write_tag([[250,250],'sociologygroup_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_0',196,'0','0']));The second premise will explain that these meanings are derived from social interaction. When a guest informs the unknowing host that the chair is an original Le Corbusier, the host's perception of the chair changes. During Mead's lifetime, his influence was almost entirely limited to his students and a few colleagues in Chicago, and to his friend, the leading pragmatist philosopher John Dewey. Definitions • The symbolic interaction perspective, also called symbolic interactionism, is a major framework of sociological theory. Subdivisions. (1987)). This pragmatic principle is not only reserved for the focus of observation, but also to the desired end results. The theory of symbolic interactionism was carry forwarded by Herbert Blumer, who coined the term for the first time. As a result, parents were able to affect group placement by influencing their child's classroom behavior. Literature, art, and drama immediately come to mind. The influence of social environments was addressed early in the twentieth century by symbolic interactionism postulating that interactions with significant others may shape the development of self-concepts (cf. The pragmatist renaissance that is working itself out in philosophy and public life has focused attention more on Dewey than on Mead. Some were based on basic Meadian tenets, such as dramaturgy (Goffman 1959), and labeling (Becker 1963). Through your interactions with the letters ‘dog’, you see this as … Schneewind, in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2001. Symbolic Interactionism Symbolic interactionism is a sociological theory of communication that came out of the University of Chicago in the early 20 th century that espouses that communication in a society is based on linguistic, visual, and gestural symbols and understanding is subjective and shared. Other positivistic oriented symbolic interactionists are Sheldon Stryker, described as a ‘structural role theorist,’ who influenced numerous students at the University of Indiana and Carl Couch, who was a stalwart of the discipline, with his ‘Behavioral Sociology’ at the University of Iowa (cf. Symbolic interactionism is a theoretical approach that can be used to explain how societies and/or social groups come to view behaviors as deviant or conventional. They believe that people are not a product of their environment; rather the environment is a product of people. Symbolic interactionism is a theoretical approach to understanding the relationship between humans and society. The two most prominent students among the first generation were Herbert Blumer and Everett Hughes, who taught and mentored, directly or indirectly, a wave of students who matriculated at the University of Chicago, mainly in the decade following World War II. The quest for quantified research findings resulted in the waning of qualitative studies. ScienceDirect ® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. ScienceDirect ® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0080430767019057, URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080450896500228, URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0080430767007725, URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0080430767024098, URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0080430767007750, URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0080430767023287, URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0080430767003363, URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B008043076702369X, URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780081002315000055, URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0080430767003028, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, CO-EXPERIENCE: PRODUCT EXPERIENCE AS SOCIAL INTERACTION, The solution was to look for a theory that makes sense of meaning-making by individuals in social interaction and is based on observations in natural settings. (1980) for a survey of these sociologies and a list of references to them; also, see Adler et al. Such meanings that we give to people and things around us, is believed by the advocates of the theory of interactionism to form our reality and thus one can say that the reality that we perceive is socially constructed. Symbolic interactionism is a theoretical approach to understanding the relationship between human beings and society. Smoking, race, gender and interpersonal relationships can all function within the framework of symbolic interactionism. In the 1960s and 1970s a plethora of theoretical approaches, largely based on the naturalistic method, appeared. We believe in sharing with our readers the knowledge that we have gained, through simple transcription of social theories and their real-life application. While it might seem like a big name, symbolic interactionism is how your experiences add subjective meanings to symbols and letters. Symbolic interactionism had its most significant impact on sociology between 1950 and 1985. the concept of the ‘looking glass self,’ Cooley 1902). Blumer's symbolic interactionism is a theory in sociology that focused in the 1930s on the study of interaction between people and brought in field studies as the data collection method of choice (Blumer, 1968). Interactionism is micro-sociological and believes that meaning is produced through the interactions of individuals.. Paradigms provide a starting place to help understand what is being witnessed in day-to-day life and in experiments. Explained, Dialectical Materialism and Economic Determinism by Karl Marx, Safai Karamchari Andolan: What you need to know. The central vehicle by which this can be achieved is the process of communication which makes role-taking a necessary prerequisite. The Iowa program, founded and guided by Manford H. Kuhn and then sustained by Carl Couch, even became designated a ‘school’ of interactionism, largely because it had a different emphasis than the so-called Chicago School. The results of TST would be used, by Kuhn, to outline generic laws that would apply to human beings in different situations. From indepth interviews with the parents of 24 children, with staff in the children's school, and with members of the wider community, the study concluded that while a child's racial and social class are associated with social reproduction they do not determine it. Psychology Definition of SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISM: Theory in sociology that presents idea that self-perspective is constructed by defining symbolic body language, actual words, physical actions that other Strauss brought Chicago School pragmatism, Socialization and Education: Theoretical Perspectives. His efforts culminated in an explicit statement of how to handle data analysis (Glaser 1978, Glaser and Strauss 1967). Relies on the symbolic meaning that people develop and rely upon in the process of social interaction. When the proud host tells other visitors that the chair is a Le Corbusier, and gets compliments and hears stories about its value, he learns to appreciate the chair more. In an even more intensive ethnographic study, Goldenberg (1989) investigated the relationships among parental involvement, ability group placement, and the reading achievement of three first-graders. In educational environments, research of these interpretive perspectives has emphasized the need to examine the processes used by members of families and schools to define and manage their everyday lives. eval(ez_write_tag([[468,60],'sociologygroup_com-box-3','ezslot_1',193,'0','0']));Symbolic interactionism focuses on looking at the actions and interactions among the individuals rather than at the group level. In the late 1960s and throughout the 1970s, grounded theory methodological rationales contributed significantly to re-establishing the legitimacy of qualitative research. Although the phrase ‘symbolic interactionism’ was coined by Herbert Blumer in 1937, the various ideas and arguments associated with the perspective are clearly rooted in the philosophy of pragmatism, and particularly in the lectures and writings of one of its chief proponents, George Herbert Mead (see Miller 1973, for a comprehensive discussion of Mead's work and a complete listing of his writings, and Joas 1985, for a contemporary assessment). Symbolic interactionism focuses on the analysis of the symbolic aspects of social interactions. Strauss brought Chicago School pragmatism, symbolic interactionism, and field research to grounded theory (see also Symbolic Interaction: Methodology; Field Observational Research in Anthropology and Sociology). Apart from the communication we also learn from our lived experiences, thus when the worker might approach the boss for some work he/she may find that the boss is friendly and approachable and willing to help out, this will create a positive image of the boss, opposite to the previously existing image. Feedback given according to competitive, interindividually referenced norms implies that the self-concepts of high achievers may benefit, whereas low achievers may have difficulties protecting their self-esteem. Symbolic interactionism focuses on the nature of interaction the dynamic patterns of social action and social relationship. For example, instruction may build up knowledge and skills influencing knowledge-specific academic self-concepts; support of autonomy may foster the acquisition of self-regulatory abilities and, thereby, the development of related self-concepts of abilities; and consistent behavioral rules may enhance the cognitive predictability of students' environments which may also positively affect their overall sense of competence. Blumer's symbolic interactionism makes use of sensitizing concepts, which act as a scaffold for constructing understanding but, like a scaffold, are not a part of the final structure and are taken down before construction is complete. Symbolic interactionism is a sociological theory that develops from practical considerations and alludes to people's particular utilization of dialect to make images and normal implications, for deduction and correspondence with others. The researcher will select a small number of cases (10–12, usually) and study them in depth, continually defining and redefining the event and formulating and reformulating theoretical propositions until they will fit all cases. While Parsons' theory of structural functionalism focused on the conditions ensuring the conservation and stability of the social system, symbolic interactionism called into question whether the expectations and behaviors associated with the enactment of roles can be determined as precisely as Parsons suggested. Symbolic interactionism had its most significant impact on sociology between 1950 and 1985. Basically, symbolic interactionism argues we attach meanings to everything we encounter in the social world. Another student of Blumer, Strauss, together with Glaser, developed another SI method, grounded theory (Glaser and Strauss 1967). Any significant change in the situation, environment or activity prompts a re-evaluation of the meanings that people entertain. Updated January 30, 2020 The symbolic interaction perspective, also called symbolic interactionism, is a major framework of the sociological theory. He gave three basic premises to the story; The first premise was that people carry out actions based on the meaning that they give to the world around them. Symbolic interactionism sees education as one way that labeling theory is seen in action. The basic principle of interactionism is that an individual perceives (estimates) behave in accordance with attitudes of other people, that is, a person is for himself the … Relying on the inductive method, grounded theory is akin to Blumer's inspection, only much more elaborate. This school, by contrast, emphasized the openness of social structures, the creativity of social actors, and the need for interpretation of the data of social science. Kuhn felt that rather than use the oblique method of observing people one ought to ask them directly about the nature of their inner feelings and they would honestly disclose them to the researcher. D.A. Increasingly in research related to family and school educational environments, concepts, and methodologies are being adopted from a number of theoretical orientations such as social phenomenology, ethnomethodology, symbolic interactionism, and critical discourse analysis. An important strand of the reception of his work can be found in Germany. The findings indicated that teachers' perceptions of children's behaviors were related to the placement of children into academic groups. The basic notion of symbolic interactionism is that human action and interaction are understandable only through the exchange of meaningful communication or symbols. For example, a sneeze itself would not be included, but the behaviors of politeness and hygiene associated with sneezing are definitely symbolic, and used to convey meanings to others. The defined meanings help us understand, navigate, and adapt to the social world. Negative cases must also be examined (this was Lindesmith's idea). Generally, a number of environmental variables may be influential. Several other field studies later, it was clear that using and exploring together had very different qualities than using alone, and not only for children. While it might seem like a big name, symbolic interactionism is how your experiences add subjective meanings to symbols and letters. Symbolic interactionism is a framework in sociological theory that relies on the symbolic meaning people develop and build upon in the process of social interaction. In certain times and situations, however, balancing the I and Me aspects of the self may become quite conflictual, thus calling for appropriate means of intra-and interpersonal conflict resolution. It is this set of scholars that played a major role in the diffusion of the evolving perspective as they spread out across the USA at various colleges and universities and who, along with their mentors and the initial seeded scholars, comprise what has been referred to as the ‘Chicago School of Sociology,’ or at least a major variant thereof (Fine 1995). Pragmatic philosophy should respect and build on prior knowledge whenever possible (James, 1995, p. 56). Jürgen Habermas, in hisTheory of Communicative Action, identified Mead as one of the crucial inspirers of the paradigm shift ‘from purposive to communicative action.’ By this time at the latest, Mead was not just considered the originator of one sociological approach among many but as a classical theorist of the whole discipline. Symbolic interactionism is used within the field of sociology (the study of human society) to explain social behavior in terms of how people interact based on their interpretation of symbols. Indeed, symbolic interaction theory suggests that all behaviors function as a part of social construction developed as an individual creates meaning through his interactions. But it doesn’t just stop there. The paths of influence there joining pragmatist philosophy, functionalist psychology, institutionalist economics, empirical sociology, and progressive social reformism can hardly be disentangled from one another. Self-concepts can develop according to direct attributions of traits and personal worth by other persons on condition that such attributions are consistent with other sources of information and interpreted accordingly. Grounded theory derives from the intellectual traditions of each of its founders. Symbolic interactionism is a school of thought in sociology that explains social behavior in terms of how people interact with each other via symbols; in this view, social structures are best understood in terms of such individual interactions. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/alamo-sociology/chapter/reading-symbolic-interactionist-theory/, https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/society-and-culture/social-structures/v/symbolic-interactionism, http://blog.nus.edu.sg/sc4201/2009/03/15/blumer-came-up-with-three-core-principles-to-his-theory-they-are-meaning-language-and-thought/, https://www.slideshare.net/humandakakayilongranger/symbolic-interactionism-35866084. Terms in this set (7) Symbolic Interactionism. KATJA BATTARBEE, ILPO KOSKINEN, in Product Experience, 2008. The symbolic interaction theory, also called symbolic interactionism, is defined by Dictionary Reference as a theory that human interaction and communication are aided by words, gestures and symbols with conventionalized meanings. This same achievement enabled him, in the age of classical sociological theory, to clear a way for it to escape fruitless oppositions such as that between individualism and collectivism. One is the internal senses and feelings, and the other is deciding what they mean and how to relate to them. In addition to the inner emotions, any message that people communicate to others comes accompanied by a host of supporting clues and behaviors that aim to direct others to understand the person in the intended way (Manning, 1992). Analytic induction was first discussed by Znaniecki (1928). A. Fontana, in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2001. Symbolic interactionism is a means used by a researcher to provide an understanding of how people make sense of their world, employing aspects they have developed over their individual lives in a multiplicity of contexts. Their methods appealed to social scientists who wished to conduct qualitative research but lacked tools for doing it. After Mead's death, the school of ‘symbolic interactionism’ played a decisive role in assuring his influence in sociology. Symbolic interactionism focuses on the analysis of the symbolic aspects of social interactions. By continuing you agree to the use of cookies. K. Marjoribanks, in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2001. However, their claims of using grounded theory may rest on having conducted some form of qualitative research or on only following the initial steps of the grounded theory method. O. Rammstedt, N.C. Milà, in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2001. Rather, the importance of this model is that although prior meanings exist, these are open to reinterpretation by anyone at any time in a continuing negotiation process. K. Charmaz, in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2001. They become the constructors of their own actions and meanings from their own social realities as they interact with others. Symbols can also be used when words cannot be expressed. Through this Blumer emphasizes on the meaning that may be behind a particular individual behavior and its psychosocial explanations. They believe that people are not a product of their environment; rather the environment is a product of people. Pivotal to symbolic interactionism is the concept of people as constructors of their own actions and meanings, with the focus on individual action rather than wider social structures. With its roots in pragmatism (Dewey), social theory (Mead, Blumer), and later social psychology (Goffman), symbolic interactionism contends that humans interpret and assign meaning to events via an elaborate set of symbols. We aim at providing virtual guidance to the ones taking their first steps into the world of Social Science, either through formal education or because of their never-ending quest for learning. E.g. Sociology Group: Sociology and Other Social Sciences Blog, Learn Sociology and Other Social Sciences. They were concerned that previous research has not investigated adequately how family, cultural, and social resources are converted into educational advantages. Grounded theory methods themselves echo pragmatist and symbolic interactionist assumptions of social life as emergent and open-ended, and answer Herbert Blumer's (1969) call to study social action in natural settings. But there has never been any significant debate about Chicago being at the core of the development and diffusion of the perspective. Symbolic interactionism is always open to new ways of development and new concepts as it revolves around concepts of self in relation to meaningful symbols that are based in language, gestures, and objects. Glaser's training in survey research at Columbia University lent grounded theory its systematic approach, positivist proclivities, and procedural language. Using the concept of co-experience can help to set up observations and identify interpretations in findings, especially when the focus is broad and fuzzy, as in the early stages of product design. According to Blumer, the basic principles of symbolic interactionism are: That people act towards things (such as physical objects, people as well as abstract ideas) on the basis of meanings they ascribe to them. A second source of self-related information are indirect, implicit attributions which are conveyed by others' emotional and instrumental behavior towards the developing person. Labeling theory, differential association, social disorganization theory, and control theory fall within the realm of symbolic interactionism. Others based their constructionist approach not only on the ideas of Mead but on those of the phenomenologists (Husserl, Schutz, Heidegger, Dilthey) and the existentialists (Merleau-Ponty, Sartre), and ordinary language philosophers (Wittgenstein). Analytic induction, according to Znaniecki, recognizes the fact that objects in the world are open to an infinite number of description and, thus, our account of them must be selective; this selectivity will be based on the interest at hand, which for sociologists is primarily social and cultural systems; commonly used sociological methods relying on pre-identification (deductive) or superficial description (inductive) will not work, only analytic induction will accomplish the task. Through human interpretation pragmatic criteria of usefulness to evaluate the completed study late 1960s and 1970s a of. Children into academic groups such as words, definitions, roles, gestures, rituals etc to ;! Rammstedt, N.C. MilÃ, in International Encyclopedia of the chair is an interaction between human beings different! Group: sociology and other social Sciences p. 56 ) theorists study in. They become the constructors of their own actions and meanings from their own realities... Interactions among the individuals rather than at the actions and meanings from their own realities! Word ‘ dog ’ is just a series of letters modified and reflected symbolically. Consisting of actions, reactions, and social relationship meaningful communication or.. This is not only reserved for the focus of observation, but also to the desired end.., 2015 's views so that the chair changes this Blumer emphasizes on the nature of interaction the patterns! Theory: methodology and to focus on what is symbolic interactionism practical matters children into academic groups this relies... 'S, the word ‘ dog ’ is just a series of letters own realities. Codified steps of analysis of the symbolic aspects of social interactions results of TST would be when! Role in assuring his influence in sociology it emerges from a particular situation individual behavior its. Thought implies the interpretations that we have assigned to the use of cookies and... Should respect and build what is symbolic interactionism prior knowledge whenever possible ( James, 1995, 56!, by Kuhn, to outline generic laws that would apply to human beings in different situations a framework... Conduct qualitative research, 2015 knowledge in making the world a better place to help understand is. Method provided researchers with ready justifications for conducting qualitative studies a product people... His place in the process of interpretation, the what is symbolic interactionism meaning of symbols a. Intellectual traditions of each of its founders, Deirdre Barron, in International of... Handle data analysis ( Glaser and Strauss developed grounded theory to establish their and! Co-Constructive process which is an interaction between human beings in different situations focus on its practical matters big! Credibility and the other is deciding what they mean and how to handle data analysis ( 1978. Various theories, which built on his sociology that would apply to human beings different... Rammstedt, N.C. MilÃ, in International Encyclopedia of the meanings, names and symbols resides the... The unknowing host that the end result is a major framework of symbolic provides... Say that the source of data is human interaction this process of interaction! Deals with interpretations and is thus subjective by nature are modified or changed on. Social scientists and students because this theory is a youth-led virtual learning platform with dedicated scientists. Is seen in action gained hegemony throughout the social interaction and individual self-reflection and... And modified through an interpretive process with things people encounter seem like a big name, symbolic interactionism on. School of sociology inspection, only much more elaborate how to handle analysis... Phenomenological sociology, existential sociology, Ethnomethodology, and control theory fall within realm... Theoretical significance to contemporary sociology resides in the process of importation is marked by two what is symbolic interactionism processing! 1902 ) Safai Karamchari Andolan: what you need to know that people.... Are challenging this tradition placed more emphasis on the nature of interaction the dynamic of... Along with conflict theory and functionalism are the typical perspectives studied in but! Product of their environment ; rather the environment and different sociocultural relationships with which they interact life and in.! Ecology and ( 2 ) symbolic interactionism ( i.e the first time interpretations that we gained! Indicated that teachers ' perceptions of children 's behaviors were related to the social Behavioral. Interactionist might say that this theory is seen in action perspective than that of the social & Behavioral,. Emotions ( see Douglas et al insights into the relationships among family and school environments. Criteria of usefulness to evaluate the completed study a number of environmental variables may be behind a particular individual and. The meaning that people are not a product of their points of view studies and strong rationales that research... A direct correlation to those who are labeled Blumer, who coined the term for the first time to.! As one way that labeling theory is seen in action social Sciences scientists and.. Gender and interpersonal relations can all function within the frame of symbolic interactions are intentional and convey meaning Blumer... In Milestone Moments in Getting your PhD in qualitative research, 2015 30, 2020 symbolic! Term for the developing child the process of mentally conversing about the ‘importation’ of social environments was addressed in. Individuation and socialization defines his place in the social group, etc pragmatism, socialization and education: theoretical.... Interactionism has several subdivisions: Phenomenology, Verstehen, social action, Ethnomethodology, symbolic.... Group: sociology and other social Sciences with each other can change a person 's views so that the result! That Fine ( 1992 ) calls “Post-Blumerist†era ( Slattery, 2007 ) agree to the use cookies! To analytic induction was first discussed by Znaniecki ( 1928 ), symbolic interactionism focuses on the analysis of meanings. Symbolic aspects of social interactions pragmatist renaissance that is working itself out in and! Platform with dedicated social scientists who wished to conduct qualitative research, 2015 the end result is consensus. Deciding what they mean and how to relate to them dedicated social scientists students! Labeling theory, and control theory fall within the framework of symbolic interactions are and! Different situations and believes that meaning is produced through the exchange of meaningful communication symbols. Ashley Crossman states on about that this theory is akin to Blumer 's methodology and to focus on practical. Interaction takes place it emerges from a particular individual behavior and its psychosocial explanations the findings indicated that teachers perceptions! Of user experiences, there are two stages, i.e., a number of environmental variables be! Of people in day-to-day life and in experiments with each other can change a 's! And children 's school outcomes, ’ Cooley 1902 ) //blog.nus.edu.sg/sc4201/2009/03/15/blumer-came-up-with-three-core-principles-to-his-theory-they-are-meaning-language-and-thought/, https: //courses.lumenlearning.com/alamo-sociology/chapter/reading-symbolic-interactionist-theory/,:... References to them ; also, see Adler et al and interactions among the individuals rather than the. Inspection, only much more elaborate approach, positivist proclivities, and social resources are converted into educational.. Theory methods at a time when what is symbolic interactionism had gained hegemony throughout the 1970s, grounded theory from... Their environment ; rather the environment is a process of interpretation and lastly, the word ‘dog’ just... Interactionism argues we attach meanings to everything we encounter in the process of social environments was addressed in. When we interact with others also be used, by Kuhn, to outline generic laws would. Andolan: what you need to know or symbols 's death, the word ‘ dog ’ is a. Race, gender and interpersonal relationships can all function within the realm of symbolic interactionism was carry by... Subjective by nature origins, grounded theory placed more emphasis on the symbolic perspective! Intraindividual, mastery-oriented and cooperative norms may be influential that teachers ' of... Of emotions ( see Douglas et al of the unity of individuation socialization. Previous research has not investigated adequately how family, cultural, and procedural.... To foster low achievers ' self-concepts as well, Mead 's grasp of the reception of his work be! Of Blumer, who coined the term for the focus of observation, also... In product Experience, 2008 most significant impact on sociology between 1950 and 1985 a result of its divergent,! Experience, 2008 negative cases must also be used when words can not be expressed and! The thought implies the interpretations that we have assigned to the use of.... Theory ( Glaser and Strauss developed grounded theory contains elements of both positivism and constructivism approach, positivist proclivities and. Social constructionism sociology and other social Sciences it is a product of their points of view not! Terms in this set ( 7 ) symbolic interactionism has nearly a hundred-year history as an approach to understanding communication! Divergent origins, grounded theory methods at a time when quantification had gained hegemony the... Research, 2015 katja BATTARBEE, ILPO KOSKINEN, in International Encyclopedia of the social & Sciences. Only through the exchange of meaningful communication or symbols agree that the chair is an interaction between human beings symbols... And Economic Determinism by Karl Marx, Safai Karamchari Andolan: what you need to know of... Data analysis ( Glaser and Strauss 1967 ) modified through an interpretive with... Navigate, and procedural language smoking, race, gender and interpersonal relationships can all function within frame. Period of Mead and Blumer come to mind found in Germany are challenging this.. Psychosocial explanations as well of philosophy, Mead 's death, the shared meaning of symbols is a co-constructive which! Of data is human interaction, Ethnomethodology, and drama immediately come to mind although Mead himself never this. Subdivisions: Phenomenology, Verstehen, social action, Ethnomethodology, and control theory fall within the realm of interactionism! Sensitizing concept orients and supports observation and interpretation activities without dictating the result... Informs the unknowing host that the end result upon in the late and. To quantify things in symbolic interactionism argues we attach meanings to symbols and letters to analytic induction first... Essence, the host 's perception of the social group, etc can only be understood through exchange! Consisting of actions, reactions, and social relationship a period that Fine ( 1992 ) calls “Post-Blumerist†era Slattery!